If there is disagreement, would anyone be opposed to fixing the URLs for the Eclipse dependencies in the repo? Eclipse 3.3 was released and all of the milestone URLs we were referencing are gone now.
+1 for switching to eclipse 3.3 +1 for the subj as well. With best regards, 2007/6/30, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think we should go for it. If there is disagreement, would anyone be opposed to fixing the URLs for the Eclipse dependencies in the repo? Eclipse 3.3 was released and all of the milestone URLs we were referencing are gone now. -Nathan On 6/29/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown > at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is > nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far. > > Shall we reopen the code to daily development work? > > Regards, > Tim
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel ESSD
