Alexei,

Sorry for misleading you. I agree that it's ok to forget about the issue
because there is the Eclipse compiler bug describing this issue. I was just
confused by Harmony and Sun verifiers behavior difference, but it's not a
Harmony issue.

--
Nina

On 7/6/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Nina,

> but also Sun's verifier bug
Mmm, I'm not sure I follow. Isn't it enough to have a bug against
Eclipse compiler to forget about this issue?

Thank you, Alexei


On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexei,
>
> I'm just not sure how we track compatibility issues if there is a
difference
> in Harmony and RI behavior. Is it now proven that it's not only Eclipse
> Compiler, but also Sun's verifier bug? If yes, I agree that it's not
> necessary to reopen the issue.
>
> --
> Nina
>
> On 7/6/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nina,
> >
> > Eclipse bug owner confirmed that this was an issue with the compiler.
> > Why do you want to reopen the issue against DRLVM?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm writing this just to bring your attention to
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3862 and ask
drlvm/verifier
> > > people to see whether it's necessary to reopen it.
> > >
> > > It says about VerifyError trown by Harmony when running a class
compiled
> > by
> > > Eclipse Compiler. It was closed as 'Cannot Reproduced', but it is
> > actually
> > > reproduced (see HARMONY-3862 comments). It looks that it's not
Harmony
> > > issue, but Eclipse compiler issue (I opened the bug against Eclipse
> > > compiler: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=194398), and
RI
> > > issue (it should also throw VerifyError, but it doesn't). But still
we
> > have
> > > different behavior on RI and Harmony implementations.
> > >
> > > So could someone take care of this issue and probably reopen it as
> > > compatibility issue if it makes sense? Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nina
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best regards,
> > Alexei,
> > ESSD, Intel
> >
>


--
With best regards,
Alexei,
ESSD, Intel

Reply via email to