2007/7/14, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/14/07, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sean Qiu wrote: > > I think maybe we can minimize our jre to attract more users. > > Take tomcat as an example, there is no need to include swing and awt > with > > tomcat. (Am i right? ) > > > > Yes :) > Although some users are depending on PDF libraries > that need some sort of rendering. Modularity is really one advantage of Harmony. However each coin has two sides, as Mladen says, maybe a customized harmony might have trouble on client's application due to lack of class.
For this trouble,maybe we can make the modules to harmony jre just like plugins to eclipse, we can make the modules on demand. Make the customization more agile.
I think, in this stage, it is the time to show our stability and compatibility with RI.
Agree. Besides, we can tell our clients how harmony modules are organized, the
dependencies between them and how to customize harmony's bootstrap bundles. Is there such a guide in our ducument? If no, i would like to add one on our wiki.
look foward to
> Bundles can take advantage from the modularity of our harmony classlib. > > Anyway,we can remove some unnessary jar from some specific applications, > > shall we? > > > > Are you saying there will be Harmony with bundled Tomcat? > Cool! > > Regards, > Mladen > -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Sean Qiu
