So... Dmitriy, thanks again for finding these fonts :)
Have you filed this issue to JIRA? If not then please do it. I'll prepare a patch. SY, Alexey 2007/7/17, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So we can use it in Harmony. Great! This will solve a number of problems for us. Thanks a lot for your help, guys! SY, Alexey 2007/7/17, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jul 16, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:33 +0400, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > >>>> 2007/7/16, Dmitriy Matveev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>> We can take this bundle of fonts as a variant: > >>>>> http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > >>>>> > >>>>> License is there: > >>>>> http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/License > >>>> Is it possible to include these fonts to Harmony? > >> > >> It is a reworded Apache 1.1 license with one additional clause > >> > >> The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software > >> package but no copy of one or more of the Font Software > >> typefaces may be sold by itself. > >> > >> which has no impact on us or anyone who redistributes our packages. > >> That means it is okay provided that the license is added to our > >> product's LICENSE file noting what it applies to. > > > > Isn't this an additional restriction over and above the terms of AL2? > > Only when it is sold as an individual typeface. It does not restrict > our software in any way. > > > My understanding of our position (and I would be more than happy to be > > corrected on this) is that anything we include should not be more > > restrictive than AL2. > > It isn't more restrictive when it is included. > > > As I understand AL2, I can take any element (or elements) of an Apache > > distribution, package it/them however I like and (providing I meet the > > redistribution requirements of section AL2.4) sell them for as much as > > I can get away with. > > No. You can take anything licensed by the ASF in that way. These > fonts are not licensed by the ASF. > > > These don't appear to be compatible. Where have I got it wrong? > > It is not our software. Compatible means that we can safely and > legally distribute our software in combination with theirs, which > we can under that license, and that the resulting package as a > whole can be redistributed under terms no more restrictive than > the Apache License terms. That clause does not restrict our > packages. > > ....Roy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for > official ASF policies and documents. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
