Alexey, thanks for pointing me to the right place. :) I've implemented this solution in a patch and attached it to HARMONY-4498. Could you please review it and commit, if appropriate? Thank you!
Vasily -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [tools] javadoc is absent Use the Source, Luke! :) org.apache.harmony.tools.javadoc.Main class with standard main method in jdk_tools will be enough. SY, Alexey 2007/7/20, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Any ideas on what name and API should that class have? :) > > Vasily > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tools] javadoc is absent > > I would say that it is better to create corresponding class for > JavaDoc which will print that "JavaDoc is not implemented yet. > > SY, Alexey > > 2007/7/19, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, all, > > > > For now, Harmony lacks javadoc executable in jdk/bin directory. This, > > for example, creates a problem when trying to add Harmony as a > > development platform to NetBeans. Creating a dummy empty file resolves > > the problem and NetBeans adds Harmony to the platform list normally. > > I've filed a jira for this issue, HARMONY-4498. > > > > Probably it would be good to workaround the problem for now by making > > another copy of the launcher named javadoc, and instructing the > launcher > > to print "Javadoc is not implemented in Harmony" diagnostic when run? > > > > Any opinions? > > > > Vasily Zakharov > > Intel ESSD > > >
