Hi, all, I've noticed that DRLVM, when throws ClassCastException, provides completely no detail about what were the class being cast and the target for the cast. This makes localizing problems in applications more difficult.
Note that RI provides information on the class being cast, and IBM VME provides information on the cast target also. It seems to me that this situation should better be corrected (to follow either IBM VME pattern or at least RI pattern), to improve DRLVM usability. Anybody (dis)agree? I filed HARMONY-4515 for this issue. Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD
