Hi Nadya, Wording certainly can be improved; feedback and suggestions are highly appreciated. Thanks for volunteering!
-- Alexey 2007/8/6, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > Do you think we should port the dev-guide.txt doc to the website? If so, > how can I help? > > Cheers, > Nadya > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:29 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [build test] documentation > > > >Alexey Varlamov wrote: > >> 2007/8/2, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> cool - this is going straight on my reading pile! Before I read it, > may > >>> I ask if this is appropriate material to convert to xml and move > onto > >>> the website? It would get better visibility there IMHO. > >> > >> This is certainly useful reading and worths to be published some day, > >> but I'm not sure it should go onto the website as is. It would be > nice > >> to merge the dev-guide.txt and spec.txt, and maybe expand on some > >> topics. OTOH, BTI is a work-in-progress at the moment, so we might > not > >> finish improving document soon enough :) > > > >ok -- and indeed you might get some more help working on the BTI if it > >is documented for those of us that don't have the history. > > > >BTI is on my list of things I should know more about. At least how to > >integrate an existing test suite into the framework like we have for > >EUT/GUT etc. I'll read the doc and offer updates as I learn about it. > > > >Regards, > >Tim >
