+1 here to have 3-months period per release instead of 2 months. For me, as for developer, it will be easier to integrate and test new features. For a Harmony every new release will have more changes and improvements and will be more noticeable for end-users Those who interested in fresh and tested builds every day - AFAIK we already do them regardless of milestone.
On 8/13/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm... Its August and lots of folks are on vacation. How about move > M3 to the end of September? This will give us a few weeks to discuss > what should (and should not) go into M3. > > On 8/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Before M2 we agreed on 2-month milestone schedule so we are close to M3. > > > > I'd like to start discussion > > - schedule: are everybody comfort with 2-month milestone schedule(IOW, > > are we ready for next milestone in the end of August) > > - plans/targets: platforms, what worse to be included to the > > milestone, fixed in the milestone > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > > > > -- > Weldon Washburn > -- Mikhail Fursov
