A patch for the build scripts would be best, as the coverage could then be generated at any time by anyone.
-Nathan On 8/19/07, Rui Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just generated a coverage report on Harmony trunk5 and branch 6 by EMMA > recently. Only public API classes are considered. The EMMA I used was > customized to collect the coverage of core java api. > The general result is: > class% --- 68% (1641/2421) > method% --- 60% (16303/27305) > block% --- 58% (330724/572138) > > The following modules are poor covered , even "zero covered": > concurrent, CORBA(ORB), XML, RMI, imageio > > coverage of awt/swing is not very high, we can improve the whole coverage > rapidly by improve these two big module. > > BTW, I need a place to publish the report (folder of many HTMLs), any > advice? Thanks a lot! > > > > 2007/8/19, Imran Ghory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > What the current status with regards to code coverage of the junit tests ? > > -ve seen the wiki page but it seems a bit out of date (last october). I've > > tried getting emma to work myself based upon a few of the mailing list > > posts > > about it without much luck. > > > > Has anyone managed to get an emma instrumented build recently ? > > > > Imran > > > > > > -- > Robert Hu > China Software Development Lab, IBM >
