Hi Sean,

would you like to try installing regular run of this suite against snapshots?
If you make the results available by some URL, I'd updated the list
of source URL (@test_results_links in [1]) and results of the testing would
automatically appear in the tables [2,3]

Thanks,
Mikhail

[1] http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots.pl
[2] 
http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots_summary.html
[3] http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r567890/index.html

2007/8/24, Sean Qiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/8/23, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Sean,
> >
> > Nice work - I've integrated this JIRA into SVN. I'm curious what is
>
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> next - TestNG, JMock, Mauve?
>
>
> I have got the test list that we can pass successfully.
> So i will try mauve first.
>
> BTW, the derby 10.3.1.4 finally release, and this one includes the derby
> junit test now. I am trying derby too.
>
>
> > BTW, recalling the XMLReporter issue with Mauve, you can simply
> > contact their developers and ask for this feature or even provide
> > ready-to-commit patch. I think it is the best solution.
> > Good luck, and looking forward for the new adapters!
>
>
> Thanks again. I will try.
>
> 2007/8/22, Sean Qiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > 2007/8/22, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > Sean Qiu wrote:
> > > > > Hi, guys
> > > > >
> > > > > I have wrote a new adaptor to integrate junit's tests into BTI 2.0.
> > > > > Could someone pls try this patch [1] ?  Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4637
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't know Sean, but hopefully the BTI gurus can comment.  I took
> > a
> > > > look at the files and it seems remarkably simple to incorporate
> > JUnit's
> > > > test suites if that is all that is required.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Yes , i am going to add some other test suites into our BTI.
> > > And this is the simplest one as a start.
> > >
> > > On a different topic, a while ago I suggested that we move the 2.0
> > > > branch to HEAD -- any BTI maintainers still up for it?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Tim
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean Qiu
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean Qiu
>

Reply via email to