All, If the quick Java 5 verifer is faster than J9 verifier and is quickly becoming bug-free, do you think we may somehow suggest them to try it for J9? Thanks!
On 9/19/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as Alexei F noted somewhere Java6 verifier might be obtained from Java5 > verifier > mostly by removing some code. > > Since we all don't want code duplication, it makes sense to split > current verifier to > common part that will be used by both Java5 and Java6 verifiers and > Java5-specific > part. > > I've made such a separation and submitted the code to JIRA [1] for review. > The modifications made are mostly splitting the files and moving > unmodified pieces > of code around. So, I submitted 'code' rather then 'patch'. > > _base suffix or no suffix means that it's a base part, common for both > verifiers > > _x suffix means that the same code operates with different types, it's > written with templates. There are 2000+ lines of such a code. > > _5 suffix means pure Java5 code > > I've created a new namespace for _5 code, so that later I'll create different > Java6-specific types with the same names in Java6-specific namespace > > Please review the code. > (it would be good to integrate it right after M3 if review is OK) > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4818 > -- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
