The pack200 tests are passing reliably on my machine, and I have just run them on DRLVM as well as the IBM VME to make sure. However I know the recent changes that went in caused test failures the first time for Tim because of some signature changes, and needed a 'clean' before the build before they would pass. Could this be the case with the snapshot, or was it definitely a clean build?
Thanks, Sian On 25/09/2007, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/24/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/22/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > According to the plan - Sept. 22 is code freeze date for M3 so let's > > > follow policy: > > > "no more commits please without agreement from two committers on the > dev list." > > > > > > Let's do more testing and analyze if there any critical/blocker issues > > > for consideration. > > > Please raise here issues that you think MUST be fixed for M3. > > > > Here is [1] the status of the last snapshot (r578410) that includes > > last classlib updates. Unfortunately, not everything is green there. > > I'm going to inspect all results to make sure that there are no > > failures caused by CC configuration issues. > > > > I've compared testing status for the last snapshot r578410 [1] with M2 > [2][3]. > > We have the following short status for failed suites: > > Windows_x86: > * classlib: 2 tests from pack200 module fail on snapshot (but pass > on debug build) > * Eclipse unit tests 3.2: there is no tests report like for M3. The > pass rate was improved from 99.32%[3] to 99.7%[1] > * Eclipse unit tests 3.3 are new and the pass rate is 99.77%. I > think is acceptable > * EGA x48 hours scenario fails. According to [4] it passed on M2. > * Functional: need more analysis, currently I see that 2 tests were > enabled and new 15 regressions. > * Geronimo: 2 regressions > * JDK tools: 1 test failed. It might be intermediate failure - the > test failed due to timeout > * Reliability: 65 tests passed for M2 and 64 for M3. Investigation > is required. > * Stress: 190 tests passed for M2 and 189 for M3. Investigation is > required. > > Linux_x86: > * classlib: 2 tests from pack200 (as for Windows), 1 luni tests > failed and 1 crash of security test > * Eclipse unit tests 3.2: 2 suites crashed so pass rate is 69.60%. I > assume this may be CC host configuration issue. Going to investigate. > * Eclipse unit tests 3.3 are new and the pass rate is 96.47%. I > think is acceptable > * EGA x48 hours scenario: the same as for Windows (scenario fails on M3) > * Functional: need more analysis, similar to Windows - some test are > passing now but there are new failures. > * Geronimo: 2 regressions (the same as for Windows) > * Reliability: need more analysis > * Stress: need more analysis > > As I remember Sean took pack200 tests. And Alexei Zakharov took > security test crash. > I'm going to sort things out with Eclipse unit tests 3.2 crash on > Linux. And to look info failed jdktools test. > > So volunteers are required for: EGAx48, Geronimo, functional, > reliability and stress suites. > > Also we have 2 JIRAs to be resolved for M3 under milstone unmblella[5]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4844 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4810 > > [1] > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r578410/index.html > [2] > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r551077/index.html > [3] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/milestones/M2 > [4] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200706.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4843 > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > > > Please feel free to pick up any issue for investigation. For example, > > 2 pack200 classlib test failed. Also there is a crash of > > > org.apache.harmony.security.tests.java.security.cert.serialization.CertificateTest > > on Linux x86 > > > > BTW, should we consider BTI's workspace (that we use for M3 testing) > > frozen too? > > > > [1] > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r578410/index.html > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > -- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
