Alexey Varlamov wrote: > 2007/9/28, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Sian January wrote: >>> I would like to use BCEL in pack200 to re-create class files from the data >>> obtained from the pack200 archive. BCEL is able to create class files in >>> the correct format and provides a higher-level interface that we would use >>> instead of creating the class files directly. This would mean that we would >>> not need to duplicate this effort in pack200 and so there would be less >>> scope for creating bugs in this area. I know that BCEL is already a Harmony >>> dependency and it's an Apache project so I can't see there being a licence >>> issue, but just wondered if anyone has any other objections? >> There is no problem with using BCEL as you say. At the moment it is a >> dependency of the DRLVM and you will need to move it to be a dependency >> of the classlib code, and then DRLVM can inherit this dependency I believe. > > Tim, > You might confuse bcel with antlr? bcel is already in classlib, > make/depends.properties says: > # bcel is needed by yoko-rmi
Of course, you are right Alexey -- I'm confused about a lot of things :-) Regards, Tim
