Similar to Tim's, but this one only shows issues that have been resolved "fixed", as opposed to "wontfix" or "invalid" etc, and doesn't include website issues or non-bug-differences:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310050&updated%3Abefore=5%2FOct%2F07&updated%3Aafter=30%2FJun%2F07&status=5&status=6&component=12311280&component=12311279&component=12310560&component=12310327&component=12311272&component=12311442&component=12310091&component=12310353&resolution=1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC I think this is a good approximation at the point in time that M3 is released, but if a bug is fixed after M3 but was updated in that timeframe then it would show up in this search wouldn't it? On 28/09/2007, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > Yep, just the link to JIRA query would be the best. > > Though I'm also not sure Web UI allows this, unless a project uses > > "Due date" feature which Harmony does not. > > Well we can approximate it by querying the issues that were > resolved/closed between the date of M2 and the date of M3. > > The problem being that it will include issues that are not part of the > release per se (such as website updates): > > e.g. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310050&updated%3Abefore=28%2FSep%2F07&updated%3Aafter=1%2FMay%2F07&status=5&status=6&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > Regards, > Tim > > > 2007/9/28, Sian January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Yes - I wasn't thinking that we would publish the whole list, I was > just > >> wondering if it was possible to do that kind of query in JIRA, and if > so, if > >> we could include a link to JIRA from the release notes that does the > query > >> for you. Does that make sense? So you click on the link and you get a > JIRA > >> search page up with the list of all the bugs fixed in M3. I know you > can do > >> it in Bugzilla but it may not be possible in JIRA (I couldn't find out > how > >> this morning). > >> > >> Otherwise (or additionally) I do think including a short list of the > most > >> important ones as you suggested would be a good idea. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Sian > >> > >> > >> On 28/09/2007, Nadya Morozova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Generally, i think it is a good idea to include fixed bugs (as well as > >>> unfixed critical bugs) into release notes. however, i don't think we > need > >>> to > >>> publish them all. those interested can always query JIRA manually, > while > >>> those not particularly interested will get a longish table of info > they > >>> don't need. > >>> we could perhaps select the most outstanding bugs and the bugs that > were > >>> in > >>> known issues in M2 and are fixed in M3. what do you say? > >>> > >>> On 9/28/07, Sian January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> I'm not sure if JIRA supports this kind of query, but if it does, > would > >>> it > >>>> be good to include a link in the release notes to a list of all the > >>> JIRAs > >>>> that have been fixed for M3? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 27/09/2007, Nadya Morozova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> as we're nearing the closure time for M3 snapshot, I thought it > would > >>> be > >>>>> great if we started writing Release Notes for them. We managed to do > >>>> that > >>>>> for our previous milestone M2 [1], but failed to do it on time to > ship > >>>>> with > >>>>> the bundle. Let's do better this time. For convenience, I've created > a > >>>>> Wiki > >>>>> page [2] to gather all things that are unlikely to be fixed before > M3 > >>> or > >>>>> are > >>>>> otherwise notable and should be in the Release Notes. > >>>>> > >>>>> I hope this way works for you. You're welcome to enter whatever > notes > >>>> you > >>>>> have, and I will assembly them into an HTML page and into > >>> site-specific > >>>>> XML > >>>>> in time for the final snapshot. Surely, an engineering review and > >>>> sign-off > >>>>> from committers would be necessary before packaging the final > version. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>> http://harmony.apache.org/documentation/milestones/m2-relnotes.html > >>>>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Milestone_M3_known_issues > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Nadya > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Unless stated otherwise above: > >>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number > >>>> 741598. > >>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 > >>> 3AU > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Cheers, > >>> Nadya > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Unless stated otherwise above: > >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number > >> 741598. > >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU > >> > > > -- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
