On 3 October 2007 at 13:32, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/2/07, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Something to think about after M3... > > > > On 2 October 2007 at 14:46, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro > te: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Currently, the next milestone candidate (r580985) is under testing. > > > > It might be more consistent if we named candidates/snapshots/etc > > using the canonical revision number - i.e. the last change revision > > number - rather than some arbitrary revision number after it (and > > before the next change). > > > > I agree. I think this may correlate with auto selection of revision > number for the next snapshot. The idea is to create automation for > collecting/analysing integrity testing results and choosing the best > revision for some period of time (for example, 48 hours)
Sounds good so long as we can find a way to pick the best revision without doing too many queries against the svn server. ;-) -Mark.
