On 10/3/07, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3 October 2007 at 15:08, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Status for milestone candidate (r580985): > > > > * Class library unit tests: > > Linux: 1 crash (HARMONY-4873), 1 failure (incorrect test - HARMONY-4872) > > * DRL VM tests > > Windows: known intermittent failure (HARMONY-4830) > > * Eclipse Unit Tests 3.2. > > Windows: the exclude list was updated (1 know issue + 3 > > intermittent were added) but there are new 68 failures. Regressions > > from the previous milestone candidate? > > Linux - I have to re-run the suite > > * Eclipse Unit Tests 3.3. > > Linux - as for 3.2 > > * Eclipse Geronimo Application (EGA) scenario x 48h - still running > > on both platforms > > * Functional Test Suite - still running on both platforms > > There fixes for several tests, also an update to the exclude list > > (HARMONY-4889) > > * Geronimo Unit Tests > > 2 regressions on Windows/Linux caused by applying patch for HARMONY-617 > > * JDKTools tests: > > Windows: 1 failure - reproducible only if the whole suite is run > > (HARMONY-4868) > > * Reliability Test Suite: > > Linux/Windows: 13 failures - of them are intermittent > > * Stress Test Suite > > Results was improved compared to the previous one: Windows - 2 > > failure, Linux - 4 failures!. (There is HARMONY-4881 with a patch to > > all failures to exclude list.) > > > > As I can see we need to: > > - investigate what happened with Eclipse Unit Tests 3.2 on Windows > > - wait for result for EGAx48 (would be nice to see it passed on both > > platforms), EUTs on Linux, functional suite (I don't expect big > > changes here - EUTs on Linux will probably timeout again, functional > > results should be a bit better), > > When are these due/likely to finish? >
By tomorrow morning except EGA on Linux (I have to reboot the host and restart the suite). -Stepan > > - make decision for HARMONY-4873 (classlib test crash on Linux) > > This is a regression from M2 so it would be nice to fix it. (Looks like > a JIT problem since it passes for me on r580985 with -Xint.) Is someone > actively looking at this? > > Depending on the complexity of the fix it is likely we'd want to restart > testing so perhaps we might have to release with this as a known issue. > Depends how long we are prepared to delay the milestone release. > > > - make decision for Geronimo unit tests - quick fix, revert patch for > > HARMONY-617 or exclude > > +1 for exclude > > > More issues? > > > > Also we should keep in mind HARMONY-4790 (mentioned by Gregory) > > I'd be inclined to delay fixing this until M4. > > -Mark. > > >
