Mikhail Loenko wrote: > The first reason is to be consistent with the past. I'm reluctant to list > contributions that we accepted but did not intergrated, but still we have > precedents.
For sure, though there are some things we try not to be consistent on ;-) > The second reason is flexibility that we gain once we accept the code: > then if someone finds that for example 10-lines of some utility code can > be reused elsewhere, they can simply copy-paste it to SVN. > > If for technical reasons we decline the contribution, then we don't > have such a flexibility Understood, and as I said, I am not opposed to the contribution, I'm just taking a little time to understand it. The vote should reflect both the housekeeping duties have been considered, of it being a presented with the right paperwork etc, *and* that it is in keeping with the goals and direction of the project. Apologies that I'm always the slow one in getting to that place :*) Regards, Tim
