> > > As a potential end user of Harmony, I would be more excited by the news > > > "compiles X hundred projects and executes all of those project test > > > suites error free" than "runs a busy copy of JIRA".
At the same time having some live examples of Harmony viability IMO can also be rather important. At least for that group of users/customers who don't believe in words and need more motivation to start spending their time/resource on downloading and trying 50M snapshot. In other words, I don't see any harm in the fact that Harmony will "run a busy copy of JIRA". Especially in case if it is already able to do this. Thanks, Alexei 2007/10/23, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2007/10/22, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Graham Leggett wrote: > > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > >>> Are there other areas where ASF currently > > >>> uses Sun's or another Java and we could use Harmony instead? > > >> > > >> JIRA and Confluence are the big ones now. Though Gump and Continuum > > >> use it for builds - but not production services. So, builds aren't as > > >> exciting. =) -- justin > > > > > > Builds expose Harmony not only to compiling a large body of existing > > > stable code, but also allows the opportunity for Harmony to run the test > > > suites on that body of code as well. > > > > > > As a potential end user of Harmony, I would be more excited by the news > > > "compiles X hundred projects and executes all of those project test > > > suites error free" than "runs a busy copy of JIRA". > > > > Me too! Please download a copy of Harmony [1] and try running a Java > > application on it. If it works, let us know (a bit of developer > > stroking always helps <g>) but more importantly if it doesn't work also > > let us know. The people who frequent this list are incredibly motivated > > to fix problems in real applications -- all you need to inspire them is > > a good bug report. > +1 :) > > SY, Alexey >
