Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Just FYI: we've already had a negative experience with parser > generated by JavaCC - see [1]. However, in that case the problem was > in the grammar itself since it was originally covered by LPGL. > > As far as I understand in the current case Regis has created the > grammar by himself so I don't see any problems. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3898
Exactly. The Java code is deemed to be a derivative of the grammar. In the case that Regis is proposing both will be ALv2. Regards, Tim
