Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2007/11/15, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14 November 2007 at 19:57, "Alexey Petrenko"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the Tomcat developers has pointed me to JPackage project[1].
This project is distributing a rather big number of Java based
projects for Linux in common way. It also distributes JDKs. Now they
have only Sun JDK in their list.
I think it would be good for Harmony to try to participate in this
project.
I've wrote a letter to JPackage discussion list and has received few
favorable responses.
Excellent.
So we probably should create JPackage compatible rpm of Harmony and
suggest it for inclusion.
The good thing that we can demonstrate all the benefits of Harmony's
modularity by creating a set of rpms and let the user choose which
parts of Harmony he really needs.
Not so good thing is that we need significant changes to Harmony's
build system to be fully compatible with building Harmony from source
RPM. Which is probably not a requirement for JPackage but a good form
for Linux community.
I assume you mean the requirements not to include external
libraries/jars? I've been thinking about this problem a little and am
keen to move things forward.
Yes, exactly. And we also need to remove build of dependencies from
DRLVM build for example.
+1 here
APR, log4cxx are provided by many distros already. This, however, is not
true for windows.
I added the hy.local.zlib option to remove one such issue but there
are many more in terms of jars/libs/fonts/etc that still need to be
addressed. I don't really like the hy.local.zlib option and think that
really we need to (re)design the way we handle dependencies consistently
across classlib/jdktools/drlvm with support for local/ system and
remote/downloaded dependencies. (The recent icu issue is a good example
of the problems that should be avoided by having an accurate, implicit,
consistent dependency implementation.)
However we can start from simple binary rpm based on Harmony M3 for
example.
Thoughts? Objections?
I don't really use rpm-based distros but I have in the past and a
reasonable knowledge of spec files. I'm happy to help.
Great!. I think we should start from simple binary RPM based on M3 build.
SY, Alexey
--
Gregory
