On 12/13/07, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/12/12, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Gregory Shimansky wrote: > > > On 12 декабря 2007 Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote: > > >> I've added several comments about new JIT features/optimizations. > > >> > > >> I think the following item should be removed from the list: > > >> > > >> - 'full speed debug' : debugging with JIT enabled > > >> > > >> It seems Gregory's comment was misinterpreted - he probably meant that > > >> the > > >> JIT-mode JVMTI debugging now works on x86_64. AFAIK it worked fine on > > >> IA32 > > >> in M3. Gregory, could you please confirm? > > > > > > Yes, what I meant is that now it is possible to debug applications in > > > default > > > (JIT) mode on x86_64. Previously in M3 this mode worked only on x86, on > > > x86_64 it was necessary to use -Xint to use interpreter. > > > > I'm sorry, that was my fault. I misunderstood. So what does 'debug > > applications in default JIT mode' mean? > > > > Any other updates? > > > > Alexey: Do you have the JAPI numbers excluding the endorsed standards > > packages? I seem to remember you sent them out, but I can't find them > > right now. > I've sent the scripts to Stepan to integrate them to BTI. So probably > Stepan have this data on hands.
Currently I don't have the data. I just converted Alexey's shell scripts to ANT script and committed it to the infra[1]. Yes, I'm going to setup JAPI automation and create reports for each snapshot. But this requires more efforts so I planed it for M5. Do you think that we need reqular JPI reports without endorsed packages right now? [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/branches/2.0/adaptors/japi/ Thanks, Stepan. > I can count the numbers tomorrow. > > SY, Alexey
