How it worked before?
2007/12/14, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 14, 2007 9:39 PM, Eugene Ostrovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > We have a regression in stress test suite: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5047 > > > > The problem is that in compressed VTable pointers mode (which is > > default for x86_64 platforms) number of classes that VM could load is > > limited by the size of VTable memory pool = 8 MB. VM crashes because > > VT pool is overflowed when the test tries to load about 34000 classes. > > (VTable for each class is >= 232 B) > > > > It seems that we need smarter memory management for VTables in compressed > > mode. > > Or probably we should disable compressed VTable pointers at all. > > Eugene, agree. I guess it should be easy to have a resizable pool for > Vtables by preserving bigger address space for it. Of course, > uncompressed vtable is also a solution. > > Thanks, > xiaofeng > > > Proposals are welcome. > > > > Thanks, > > Eugene. > > > > > > -- > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com >
