Thanks, Mark! SY, Alexey
2008/1/16, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 16 January 2008 at 15:53, "Alexey Petrenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/1/16, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2008/1/9, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > On 9 January 2008 at 19:07, "Alexey Varlamov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > m> wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > We did a few iterations refactoring the subject - let's have one more > > > > > a > > ccess > > > > > ;). > > > > > Why? There was a desire to have the following: > > > > > 1) More fine-grained control over dependencies to empower modularity; > > > > > 2) Unified approach and shared scripts across Harmony modules - VMs, > > > > > classlib, jdktools; > > > > > 3) Reduce duplication of resources (traffic, space, etc) between > > > > > modules within the same workspace; > > > > > I'd also add 4) If possible, reuse resources in different workspaces. > > > > > This would be quite handy for committing purposes and for > > > > > multi-platform development. > > > > > > > > I like all of the above but would add Tim's suggestion from a few weeks > > > > back which I think was something like: > > > > > > > > 5) Move binary dependencies - like all the icu libs - from the enhanced > > > > to the standard tree in svn and download them via http as we do other > > > > dependencies during the fetch-depends stage. > > > > > > +1. Checking out tens of megabytes of unrelated binaries is really > > > annoying > > ! > > +1 > > I started looking at fixing this earlier today ... making steady > progress but I've just got a new laptop so I am a little distracted now. > > -Mark. > > >
