2008/1/17, Vasily Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Indeed, thank you Mark, I've forgot about participating libstdc++ in gcc. > Usually I avoid using C++ in development and will continue avoid it ;). > The radical solution for us would be to swith using alternative opensource stdc++ lib...
> > On Jan 17, 2008 11:15 AM, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 17 January 2008 at 6:04, "Vasily Levchenko" < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Konstantin, folks, > > > > > > On Jan 16, 2008 5:25 PM, Konstantin Lupach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Mark, can you please comment what are the licensing issues > > > > preventing us from libstdc++ redistribution you are talking about? > > > > > > There shouldn't any legal issues as soon as libstdc++ is LGPL'ed > > > > Vasily, where did you find a reference to libstdc++ and LGPL. If I look > > at the debian copyright file for libstdc++ it only mentions GPL. (It > > mentions an exception to libstdc++ v3 which I think still applies but > > I'd have to check.) > > > > Unlike libc which is a separate package, libstdc++ is really part of > > gcc/g++ which is GPL so that is the license I always assumed it had? > > > > Regards, > > Mark. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > --vvl >
