On 10 January 2008 at 12:54, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10 January 2008 at 14:40, "Aleksey Shipilev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've just recently noticed the tool [1] developed by Coverity, > > which does static code analysis for projects. It seems to be used > > by major OSS players as another opportunity for QA: that include > > but no limited to Linux kernel, Samba, Perl, Python, PHP. Moreover, > > they recently introduce Java support. Even though it's focus is > > security, judging on reports it could detect memory leaks and > > other stability-important stuff. I think it's worth to try scan > > Harmony. What do you think? > > I'd also noticed that they had started accepting Java-based projects. > I think we should ask them to scan Harmony code. > > Perhaps we should break it down a little rather than submitting the > entire code base as one project. I also think we should *not* submit > code - such as modules/concurrent - where we don't have the ability to > fix the upstream versions ourselves. > > I'd be happy to contact them regarding scanning the classlib code if > people think it would be a good idea.
I'm going to start discussions - for classlib enhanced code only initially - in the next few days unless anyone objects. -Mark.
