Mark, I support this move, apparently common build should follow general structure for smooth branching. I thought about it myself but inclined to postpone until real demand appeared. -- Alexey
2008/2/6, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I was hoping Alexey might comment on this given his involvement in the > changes but I think it is a good idea to "fix" this now. Unless anyone > complains I will take a look at doing it tomorrow. > > This will break builds and people will need to "svn switch" their > commond_resources tree (or remove it and re-populate it if you have > infinite bandwidth). > > Regards, > Mark. > > ------- Forwarded Message > > From: Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [announce] new DRLVM build system came into force > Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:20:50 +0000 > > Excellent! > > Before we get too comfortable with the changes we might want to think > about whether: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/common_resources > > should really be moved to: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/common_resources/trunk > > We are going to want to be able to reproduce build so having the > capability to use branches and tags might be useful. And it would > be more consistent with the layout of the other svn-switched > sub-directories of the federated build. > > I'll take a look at moving the dependencies in classlib to common_resources > but before I force everyone working on classlib to checkout common_resources > I'd like to get this resolved so we don't end up breaking it later. > > - -Mark. > > On 4 February 2008 at 16:51, "Alexey Varlamov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > The new build system for DRLVM is now the offical one, our integrity > > and snapshot CC systems were switched to it before this weekend. > > Currently there is certain duplication of resources between the new > > and old systems (property files, etc); I suggest we drop the old > > system in a week or two. > > Also, the old build directory encloses x-lists and MSVC solutions. > > X-lists apparently should be moved closer to test sources, but what > > about the solutions - just move them to working_vm/make? AFAIU they > > need update to changed deploy dir names, any volunteers? > > Meanwhile please be careful to update the right files, those in > > <working_vm>/make tree. > > I've updated GettingStarted page to reflect build changes, and will > > update README.txt soon. Hopefully the transition to unified build > > interface will be smooth for DRLVM developers. > > > > -- > > Alexey > > > > > ------- End of Forwarded Message > > > > > >
