On 2/26/08, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > So it looks like that there are no critical issues for r629320. > > Should we start voting to declare r629320 as M5? > > > Wonderful -- looks like I came back at just the right time (to avoid > testing work <g>) > > Starting a vote is fine by me. We should be voting on the source bundle > as our official M5 artifact, the binaries are a convenience. We need a > minimum of 3 +1's from the PMC for it to pass. > > Do you want me to conduct the vote?
OK. I'll start a separate thread. -Stepan. > > Regards, > Tim >
