Sounds good to me.

On 03 Mar 2008 02:25:49 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the 0x3FA day of Apache Harmony Nathan Beyer wrote:
>
> > It's still too easy to make a mistake. The best bet is get the RI's
>  > fixed and get the build to force the correct thing.
>  >
>  > Yes, I do use svn diff, but not on generated code, which is what the
>  > HTML files are. In the future, all I'll do is just NOT change these
>  > pages.
>
>  As a probably convenient alternative, we might require the doc build
>  to run under Harmony, so that it breaks otherwise. That way it is not
>  too easy to break anything. The error message could say something like:
>
>  "Building website is not supported on runtimes other than
>  Harmony. Please, set your JAVA_HOME accordingly. You can download the
>  latest Harmony release here: <...>"
>
>  How does it sound?
>
>
>
>  > -Nathan
>  >
>  > On 01 Mar 2008 23:04:21 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > On the 0x3FA day of Apache Harmony Nathan Beyer wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > Here's the change I made -
>  > >  > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=628236.
>  > >
>  > >  yes, you can see from the patch that Russian text has changed in many
>  > >  places where was not intended to. So, "svn diff" helped to see
>  > >  that. This way I kind of proposed the way how one can make sure if
>  > >  their changes is OK for Russian. Using this technique it is not "too
>  > >
>  > > easy for people to innocently do the wrong thing here".
>  > >
>  > >  So I do not see the reason of making it completely automatic (since
>  > >  looking at svn diff is generally a good practice). Automation would be
>  > >  like put a non-visible test string to the header of each Russian page
>  > >  and verify that the diff does not contain it. Is it easy?
>  > >
>  > >  But the situation is awkward, I agree.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  > On 01 Mar 2008 12:14:11 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >  > > On the 0x3FA day of Apache Harmony Nathan Beyer wrote:
>  > >  > >  > This happened to me. I don't know Russian, but when I updated 
> the site
>  > >  > >  > for the changes to the ant targets, I figured it was fine to 
> change
>  > >  > >  > the bit that said "ant XXXX".
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Natan, I did not understand this phrase quite well. Would you, plz,
>  > >  > >  put it in other words so I could understand what happened? I am so
>  > >  > >  sorry :)
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > -Nathan
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > On 29 Feb 2008 23:09:31 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > > On the 0x3F7 day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote:
>  > >  > >  > >  > Gregory Shimansky wrote:
>  > >  > >  > >  > > Alexei Zakharov said the following on 22.02.2008 13:48:
>  > >  > >  > >  > >> Hm, I can build Russian pages without any corrupted 
> symbols in it
>  > >  > >  > >  > >> using RI on Win32. What this bug is about?
>  > >  > >  > >  > > This is a strange bug and it manifests differently on 
> different
>  > >  > >  > >  > > windows installations. I think it also depends on your 
> system
>  > >  > >  > >  > > language settings on windows. The bug is in wrong 
> generation of
>  > >  > >  > >  > > UTF-8 characters for some of Cyrillic letters. See [1] and
>  > >  > >  > >  > > predecessors for more details.
>  > >  > >  > >  > > [1] http://harmony.markmail.org/message/lcjnldxiisawfzxq
>  > >  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > >  > Is there any way we can put a check in the build script to 
> ensure the
>  > >  > >  > >  > Russian text has not been broken?  Even if it is just 
> checking that
>  > >  > >  > >  > you are running on a Harmony JRE.
>  > >  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > >  > It sounds too easy for people to innocently do the wrong 
> thing here.
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > >  why?
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > >  if you do not know Russian, you probably would not edit it. 
> So, "svn
>  > >  > >  > >  diff" would tell you if characters in Russian text changed. 
> And if
>  > >  > >  > >  they did, hey, the wrong thing was about to get in :)
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > >  --
>  > >  > >  > >  Egor Pasko
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  --
>  > >  > >  Egor Pasko
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >  Egor Pasko
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Egor Pasko
>
>

Reply via email to