Thank you for your help Xiao-Feng. I will prepare description of my work just a little bit later. Sorry but this due to my NSU activities :)
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04 Mar 2008 13:24:24 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the 0x3FD day of Apache Harmony Yuri Kashnikoff wrote: > > > Xiao-Feng, > > > > > > > > > > Yuri, simply copying gc_gen_iterate_heap() doesn't work, because the > > > > heap state could be transient during collection. Especially for the > > > > second insertion, it is in the middle of a transition from a minor > > > > collection to a major collection, so the objects' states are not > > > > consistent. > > > > > > > > Does your original code without mutator iteration work for you to > > > > iterate live objects in MOS? > > > Yes. I found the place where objects' states are consistent. And it > works well. > > > Thank you for your answers, they helped me a lot. > > > > > > I would like to find a place where all objects in MOS are marked as > > > live/dead, but before > > > compactisation. May such state be produced by playing with > > > num_marking_collectors ? > > > Or is there any appropriate method to produce such state (for further > > > MOS iteration)? > > > > OFFTOPIC > > > > Yuri, do you have time do tescribe your project in the mailing list or > > on wiki? Looks interesting :) > > Yes, that would also help me to give the right answer. > > Thanks. > xiaofeng > > -- > > Egor Pasko > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com > -- Yuri S. Kashnikov Novosibirsk State University, Russia 2 Pirogova street 630090, Novosibirsk-90 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
