Good news :) 2008/3/13, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oliver, > That is great! BTW, which API are you using for shared memory access? > Is it a part of the portlib? > > Thanks! > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Deakin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jimmy/Alexei, > > > > Im starting to look at implementing shared memory transport for jdwp. > > It's very early days at the moment, but I have been able to open the > > shared memory space (created by the RI running as server) and read some > > data from it. I have also been able to mirror this behaviour, with > > Harmony running in server mode. I will start to check in some changes > > soon, initially for the build system to start building dt_shmem.dll on > > Windows. After that I will start checking in some of my code and add > > some changes to the jpda test setup so it can run the tests in shared > > memory mode. > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > > Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2008/2/22, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> Jimmy, > > >> > > >> I fully support your idea, but cannot follow the discussion fully. The > > >> old thread mostly discussed a shared memory protocol, didn't it? This > > >> thread no longer mentions a shared memory, but discusses an API update > > >> instead. May be all these things are parts of the whole picture, but > > >> the picture slips out of my mind. I would suggest being merciful to my > > >> google-weakened brain and write some justifications of the decision > > >> taken. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Yes, I never forget shared memory, but it seems we need more > > > information of that (according to the conclusion of last discussion). > > > However java6 updating is easier to work on and we've got all > > > information on java spec, as a result, IMO, we'd better start from the > > > easy beginning, and leave hard work alone until we find some other way > > > to resolve it, do you think so? :) (Maybe someone already has a plan > > > on it :) > > > BTW, as today is friday, have a nice weekend :) > > > > > > > > >> For example, I believe Mikhail L. justification: "I don't think that > > >> time and efforts are an issue. The time flies when you are having fun > > >> :)" is quite explanatory. Or you may come up with something more > > >> rational. > > >> > > >> Thanks. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> > Hi All, > > >> > > > >> > As discussed before, we can start JDWP updating and improving. > > >> > IMHO, let's start from the easiest way, updating to java 6. > > >> > My proposal is: > > >> > 1. Setup a branch of JDKTools for java6 in harmony repository > > >> > 2. add/improve JDWP functions into java6 level. As the main > updating > > >> > for java6 JDWP is about JDWP-protocol, it seems no much effect on > VM > > >> > and debugger. > > >> > > > >> > As M5 freeze will be done at the end of this week, may start > > >> > from next week on. Any comments/suggestions/Volunteers? Thanks! > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > Best Regards! > > >> > > > >> > Jimmy, Jing Lv > > >> > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> With best regards, > > >> > > >> Alexei > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Oliver Deakin > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > > > > > > > > > -- > With best regards, > > Alexei >
-- Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu China Software Development Lab, IBM
