On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Ian Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xiao-Feng Li wrote: > > I don't know how Ian wants to roll out his RVM visualization proposal. > > Ian, do you plan to enhance GCspy with TuningFork idea or to migrate > > RVM to work with the TuningFork framework? > > > > Hi Xiao Feng, > > the proposal actually comes from Richard Jones [1] so I'd like to defer > to him. My experience of visualization in GCspy was that it was a > little hard to get going. In the meantime tuning fork has been actively > maintained. My feeling is that migrating the RVM to work with tuning > fork would be a better idea than to breathe life back into GC spy's > visualization - but this is based on my limited experience.
Thanks, Ian. The info is useful. I will do more homework. Thanks, xiaofeng > Regards, > Ian > > [1] http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/~rej > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
