IMO this depends on whom you see as a target user for BTI. AFAIU there
are two persons who make daily snapshot testing and aware of all BTI
parameters and configuration tips - Stepan and you. And both of you
probably well informed on how to configure BTI properly - where is the
place to change URLs from HTTPS to HTTP and vise versa. All other
users (many of which are committers) are interested only in couple of
test suites and in the most convenient way to run tests, view results
and propagate possible changes in test sources to svn. So for the
current default BTI configuration a quick start guide contains more
required steps (i.e. an extra svn switch) than it may be,

Regards,
Alexei

2008/3/26, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/3/25, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I've tried this, but it reported
>  >
>  > svn: 
> 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/trunk/tests/struts_test'
>  > is not the same repository as
>  > 'http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf'
>  >
>  > Now I recall that I probably used "--relocate" switch in the same
>  > situation in the past. However, yesterday I wasn't smart enough.
>  > Anyway, I don't see much reason in setting the default location to
>  > "http://svn.apache.org/blah/blah/blah";. Is this a special feature of
>  > our BTI? IMO Apache's svn server can afford using HTTPS in case if our
>  > CC is not hitting it every two seconds.
>
>
> Anyway HTTPS imposes higher strain on Apache servers - don't forget
>  you're not alone hosting CC instance. Besides it increases response
>  time for clients (startup time of CCs) - which is noticeable for
>  highly charged CC (like our snapshot testing).
>  So the _default_ should be HTTP, and in _special cases_ swn switch is
>  the friend as they say ;)
>
>  Regards,
>
> Alexey
>
>
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Alexei
>  >
>  > 2008/3/25, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  > > Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>  > >  > Thanks Stepan. By the way, I also noticed that by default all test
>  > >  > sources are downloaded from
>  > >  >
>  > >  > http://svn.apache.org/repos/....
>  > >  >
>  > >  > This is a bit inconvenient if you are a committer and trying to commit
>  > >  > changes in tests. Because svn refuses to commit anything if the
>  > >  > repository URL doesn't start with HTTPS. So yesterday I had to
>  > >  > recheckout all sources in order to commit a trivial change to struts
>  > >  > tests.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > In cases like this, where you know it is the same resources at a
>  > >  different URL, svn switch is your friend.
>  > >
>  > >  Regards,
>  > >
>  > > Tim
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  > 2008/3/25, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  > >  >> On 3/22/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >  >>  > On 3/21/08, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >  >>  > > Hi Stepan,
>  > >  >>  > >
>  > >  >>  > > Today I was trying to update the buildtest workspace and found 
> that
>  > >  >>  > > you've made several changes to it. I tried to read README.txt 
> but this
>  > >  >>  > > was not very helpful since the file itself looks outdated. Then 
> from
>  > >  >>  > > svn logs I understand that you've added new 'install' target to 
> main
>  > >  >>  > > build.xml . So what is the correct sequence now
>  > >  >>  > >
>  > >  >>  > > ant install
>  > >  >>  > > ant -Dtest.suites=struts_test setup
>  > >  >>  > > ant -Dtest.suites=struts_test run
>  > >  >>  > >
>  > >  >>  >
>  > >  >>  > Yes, this is correct sequence now, but install should has
>  > >  >>  > -Dtest.suites=struts_test param too.
>  > >  >>  >
>  > >  >>  > I'm sorry that I didn't warned about the change and not updated
>  > >  >>  > README. Currently I'm working on infra's improvements to make work
>  > >  >>  > flow more simple/transparent and resolve several issues mentioned 
> on
>  > >  >>  > the dev-list. Please be patient to me if I broke something or the 
> doc
>  > >  >>  > is inconsistent.
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >> BTW, if you find something broken please let me know.
>  > >  >>  Also in this case you may use BTI's svn revision < 639550 - it 
> should work.
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >>  Thanks,
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >> Stepan.
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >>  > After I complete improvements I'm going to align the
>  > >  >>  > README and the page on the web-site.
>  > >  >>  >
>  > >  >>  > Thanks,
>  > >  >>  > Stepan.
>  > >  >>  >
>  > >  >>  > > ?
>  > >  >>  > >
>  > >  >>  > > Regards,
>  > >  >>  > > Alexei
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  >
>

Reply via email to