Thanks for links and additional information. I noticed that CSS parser is created by JavaCC. As far as I know there is another one parser generator - ANTLR. So the question is: which tool is more
preferred/better JavaCC or ANTLR? 2008/3/28, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Alexei Fedotov wrote: > > Hello Aleksey, > > That's great that you appeared on the list. That is nice to chat on > > GTalk, but the list is preferred. People tend to think thoroughly > > before sending their letters, so the communication become more > > thoughtful and transparent. Please, don't hesitate to ask questions on > > the list: UK guys provide us an object lesson in English courtesy > > here. > > > LOL, yeah, not like those brash American-types ;-) > > > > I'm happy that you are ok with RTF editor task. From mentor's FAQ it > > reads that getting two dependent projects accepted is harder than > > different projects. > > > I think we just need the grammar, look at [1] for the CSS grammar. > > We already looked at one [2] contribution for RTF but the license does > not allow us to incorporate it into Harmony. We need an equivalent to > that (but don't derive it from this version). > > [1] > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/common/org/apache/harmony/x/swing/text/html/cssparser/CSSGrammar.jj?view=markup > [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3898 > > > Regards, > > Tim > -- Thanks, Aleksey
