Hi Nathan,

I have done the requested modifications.

Regards,
Senaka

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> BTW - There's a main page for ALL dev configuration pages -
> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DevelopmentPlatformConfiguration
>
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DevConfiguration_Ubuntu7-10
> >
> >  contains a guideline on installing Harmony on Ubuntu 7.10.
> >
> >
> >  1. Xerces distribution at given download target is faulty
> >  2. Need to separately checkout log4cxx
> >
> >  Are required to be corrected from the Harmony side I believe, as this
> >  doesn't seem to be some OS specific requirement.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Senaka
> >
> >  On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  > wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > Senaka Fernando wrote:
> >  > > > Thanks to the valuable discussions on this list I was able to
> >  > > successfully
> >  > > > build Harmony on Ubuntu 7.10 in less than a day. Below are some
> of my
> >  > > > experiences.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > 1. Requirement of ant-optional
> >  > > > 2. Requirement of setting ANT_OPTS even on Ubuntu
> >  > > > 3. Xerces distribution at given download target is faulty
> >  > > > 4. Need to separately checkout log4cxx
> >  > > > 5. Need to install package libxtst-dev
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Also, some methods discussed on the list weren't required (ex:-
> soft
> >  > > links
> >  > > > for libXtst). In addition to that I noticed a number of warnings
> when
> >  > > > building C/C++ source.
> >  > >
> >  > > Good job Senaka.
> >  > >
> >  > > Perhaps you could update/enhance the wiki [1] with your
> experiences.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > +1. working on that now
> >  >
> >  > Regards,
> >  > Senaka
> >  >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DevConfiguration_Ubuntu6
> >  > >
> >  > > Thanks,
> >  > > Tim
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >
>

Reply via email to