On 30 марта 2008 Nathan Beyer wrote: > There seem to be all sorts of quirks between Ant v1.6.5 and Ant > v1.7.0. The most recent I just ran into was the DRLVM cunit tests > failing because of the use of 'refid' instead of 'id' in the > 'includepath' element [1]. > > Since v1.7 has been out for quite a while now and most unix and linux > variants are shipping that version as the default, I'd like to suggest > that we move to v1.7 as the officially supported version. This would > essentially be updating all doc (web site, readmes, etc) and perhaps a > minor code pause to facilitate the switch. > > thoughts?
+1 I've been using a custom Ant location since I had to copy junit and ecj there. Now that I learned about ~/.ant/lib I am going to use system default Ant installation and it is 1.7.0 on most systems indeed. -- Gregory
