I have edited subject line a bit more to follow prefix conventions [1]. [1] http://harmony.apache.org/mailing.html
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alexei, > > First of all, sorry for that subject-line in the previous e-mail. :)... > > Well, I'm working on a check-out of the gc_gen folder with my own build file > (simple call to g++). But, in terms of the project what I thought was that > the build files should accompany each distinct component. Thus, as the gc is > a distinct component, that has a scope independent of the VM, the proposal > for the separate makefile. > > I think that I'd better setup some version control locally... perhaps... > that should be great. Because, I myself might want to revert some of my > modifications but not all. > > Regards, > Senaka > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello Senaka, > > > > This is a natural approach to start thinking of an automatic build at > > the beginning of the big project. You might notice a patch of your > > predecessor to the Parrot build system which was originated from the > > same activity. The only problem is that infrastructure would take > > several weeks of your precious time and won't give you anything for > > task completion. > > > > I suggest reusing current build system and avoid moving any files. The > > main problem of this build system is that it compiles a lot of stuff > > you don't need, and this should be just deleted from build files and > > your repository. The only infrastructure thing I would recommend you > > to set up is a control version system because I do not see a natural > > way of incremental development of your project using Harmony svn. > > > > Just reduce a build time to 15 seconds and continue with Parrot / GC > > bridge. You will face a real challenge there. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Currently, the makefile for gc_gen is located inside the > > drlvm/trunk/make/vm > > > folder. However, in the process of making gc_gen an independent entity, > > > isn't it better that we move this to drlvm/trunk/vm/gc_gen/make and > > refer it > > > from, drlvm/trunk/make/vm/gc_gen.xml? Thoughts? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Senaka > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > With best regards, > > Alexei > > > -- With best regards, Alexei
