On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim, > I've caught that the release cycle for Eclipse includes one year > stabilization period when no new third party code is allowed. This > period starts at the end of April and continues for nine months. We > are trying to catch up to the last train for this year. Vasily, is > this correct? Yes it's true... We're unable to inject third parties till on next iteration till Ganymede release . And then we've to wait a year to be in next release of Eclipse. > > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Vasily Levchenko wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Vasily Levchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Alexey Petrenko < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Vasily, > > > > > > > > > > > what is the exact deadline for you to have new Harmony build? > > > > > > Can you use one of the regular snapshots (not milestone build)? > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I afraid that Eclipse IP review procedure require some milestone > > build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you answer Alexey's question other question though, what is the > > > > deadline they are working to? i.e. why can't they wait until > Harmony M6 > > is > > > > released before including the functionality in TPTP? > > > > > > > > > > End of April is deadline, and actually the problem is that we are > unable > > to > > > add third party components after this deadline. > > > > > > > But I don't understand why? Presumably this is not their last ever > > release, so why not wait until the next release to include this > > functionality from Harmony? That's how dependencies usually work. > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > The good news that M5 is > > > passed IP review and next review will be review of diff, that > > significantly > > > reduce time of review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as I remember we spend about a week for milestone build > > > > > > testing. > > > > > > However, I believe that we will try to help you since Eclipse is > our > > > > > > best friend :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that we need some special build with additional requirements > to > > > > > verifier-ext.lib. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a bit of a late call even if we wanted to change our cycle to > > > > coincide, and I'm not convinced that we do in this case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't ask to change your release cycle, I'm asking about make an > > > exception in your traditional release scheduling. You probably could > mark > > > required snapshot as M6.RC1_Eclipse_TPTP ;) to avoid misunderstandings > > from > > > your customers and users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/4/11, Vasily Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > Recently I and some Eclipse folks have finished prototyping > java > > 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > support > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for Eclipse/TPTP project using Harmony verifier for > recalculation > > > > > > > stack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > map > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tables after instrumentation, thanks to Mikhail Loenko to > realize > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > requirements to extend verifier functionality. Unfortunately > > > > > > > extended > > > > > > > functionality wasn't included in M5 release of HDK, so > we're in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > position > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when we need some official snapshot (intermediate release), > > because > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difference in releasing cycles between Eclipse and Harmony. > > > > > > > Actually we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > less then couple of weeks to launch legal review for binary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribution of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harmony verifier in Eclipse CVS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Additionally: > > > > > > > Eclipse have some ABI limitation for native code: Windows all > > code > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > compiled with VC6, here I expect some incompatibility with > > Harmony > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > binaries, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for Linux all sources are compiled gcc 2.96. > > > > > > > We're also interested that > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5706(introducing > > "C" > > > > > > > interface) will be on the trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the question is: is it possible to make special > unscheduled > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > official release to meet Eclipse legal and ABI requirements? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > --vvl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei > -- --vvl
