2008/4/16, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Endre Stølsvik wrote: > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > > > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > > > > > I do not think that we are really need any other test results then > Mn-1 > > > > > > > > > > I agree, keep the last Milestone for regression checking, and if you > really want to be nostalgic keep the last two, but anything beyond that is > unnecessary. > > > > > > > Why not keep everything? I guess the space it takes isn't quite the issue? > > > > You can more easily see trends in the data with more than two datapoints, > uncovering more subtle regressions etc. And it may even have a tint of "fun" > to it, seeing how much better it became over time, for each milestone, > revision and version. > > > > (Of course, these data can be recreated by checking out the older > milestones and run the tests again... but ..) > > > > If space is not an issue then yes, we might as well keep them around, but we > share finite resources with the rest of Apache so I think we should only > keep what we think we will need. > > If somebody has an idea to use it for archaeological purposes then fine.
AFAIR number of files was the main issue, though space may become an issue too in some future :) Kinda compromise is possible, to compress older data and provide a link to the bulk archive if someone needs detais. Summary pages do not eat much anyway. -- Alexey > > Regards, > Tim >
