Tim, As far as I understand Eclipse IP committee needs a revision number to be supplied (no binaries involved). The favour Vasily is asking about is providing him with a slightly tested revision. This would suppress a normal work of committers for one day. Is it something we cannot afford?
Thanks. On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm really not convinced this is a good idea for Harmony, and my concerns > are in two parts: > > 1) Our schedule should not be dictated by an external project, especially > when it is their process that seems to be setting the artificial time limit. > Why not show some flexibility to meet our dates? > > 2) Our principle delivery mechanism is source code. While we make binaries > available as a convenience we should not encourage dependents to put > dependencies on our build tools. They should take source and compile it > themselves for their own environment. > > Regards, > Tim > > Vasily Levchenko wrote: > > > $subj. > > > > > -- With best regards, Alexei
