Oh. Isn't that using Velocity via Ant? I see that this has been fixed by upgrading the commons-collections component though.
-Nathan On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use this wording for the web site (http://harmony.apache.org) sources > (located at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/standard/site). > The web site generator uses Harmony to convert from xml documents > (located at site/xdocs) to html documents (located at site/docs). > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > What's the "Harmony documentation system"? > > > > -Nathan > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Alexei Fedotov < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Nathan, > > > What else is blocked by the fact that we mandate manifest versions in > > > manifests? I was asking myself the same question. This night I found > > > out that Harmony documentation system depends on it. More precisely, > > > Anakia refuses to load Apache commons. This means we have to set up a > > > workaround until "commoners" fix their manifest. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > I just got through getting the Eclipse guys to fix their test > artifacts. > > > > Argh... > > > > > > > > Keep in mind - this isn't a manifest in some long-used application, > > > this is > > > > a mocked up manifest used in a test case. I'd like to get a better > > > feeling > > > > for how many real invalid manifest files are out there. So far it's > > > just > > > > three files in some test cases, which have already been fixed. What > > > else is > > > > out there? > > > > > > > > -Nathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL > > > > PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Even though the manifest is invalid according to the spec, > shouldn't > > > we be > > > > > parsing it the same way as the RI for compatibility reasons? > > > > > > > > > > I wonder how many apps have invalid manifests. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > Nathan Beyer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Careful, the test isn't necessarily invalid - that's quick > > > assumption. > > > > > > It > > > > > > needs to be verified that the test isn't dyanamically > generating a > > > > > > manifest > > > > > > with Harmony's classlib; it's possible that Harmony's classlib > is > > > > > > creating > > > > > > the invalid manifest, which later causes a failure when reading > the > > > > > > manifest. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Nathan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Vladimir Beliaev < > > > > > > [EMAIL > > PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > < > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > According to the issue quick evaluation the tests are invalid, > so > > > noted > > > > > > > revision helped to detect them. The tests are to be excluded > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim, Alexei, thank you for your input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/4/18, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > < > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > < > > > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > > > We are sorting that out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Tim Ellison < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > < > > > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It'll be a couple of days before I can look at it as I'm > > > going > > > > > > > > > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take a look when I get back if nobody beats me to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir Beliaev wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've opened > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARMONY-5747< > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5747> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > reports regression in EUT/update suite due to r641928 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [apply patch > > > > > > > > > > HARMONY-4569< > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4569> > > > > > > > > > > ([classlib][performance] > > > > > > > > > > Ineffecient manifest parsing results in slowdown when > > > debugging > > > > > > > > > > java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code)] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you take a look at regression & get it resolved, > > > please? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > With best regards, > > > > > > > > Alexei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > With best regards, > > > Alexei > > > > > > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei >
