On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After a few years of this I think we should just edit the code > > directly. I think our original thoughts around the management of it > > didn't materialize. Also, the code was public domain, so we own it > > now. > > +1 >
I recall it was because we didn't really want to own it, but to always have updated code drop. I guess it's not that terrible to merge certain fixes, considering its current stability. Thanks. > > > -Nathan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/8/08, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > >>> Yeah, I've thought the same. Only unclear bit is how should it be laid > > >>> in SVN - modules/concurrent is svn:externalized - do you have any > > >>> tricks in mind? > > >> > > >> Argh - really I should have looked into modules/concurrent first, > > >> sorry. Everything is in place already. > > > > > > Yeah, if we put the correct version in concurrent/src/main/java/... then > > > the build script will take it in preference to the (externalized) code > > > in concurrent/standard/src/main/java/... and life is good. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Tim > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com > > > > > > -- > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
