Thank you all for participating. +1 from me. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. > > On 5/19/08, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> "Stepan Mishura" writes: >> > >> > On 5/14/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On 5/7/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > Here is r653525 snapshot testing status. Briefly, there are several >> > > > failures: some of them are intermittent (many in functional suite) >> > > > and/or known issues (i.e there is JIRA for tracking, some of them are >> > > > quite old). Also there are several new regressions (sigh, as usual >> > > > :-() for investigation if they are blockers for M6 or not. >> > > > >> > > > Please add your comments and clarifications. >> > > > >> > > >> > > If there are no more comments I'm going to start voting to declare the >> > > snapshot as M6 milestone build. >> > > >> > >> > The testing cycle for r653525 [1] was completed. And most of test >> > results were evaluated [2]. >> > >> > As usual - there are some issues that should be fixed but none of them >> > look critical. In case if you think that a particular issue is a >> > blocker for M6 please speak up. >> > >> > So should we declare r653525 build as M6 milestone and unfroze the >> > trunk for active code development? >> > >> > [1] >> > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r653525/index.h >> > tml >> > [2] >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200805.mbox/%3c6e47b >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Stepan. >> > >> >> >> > > > -- > Pavel Pervov, > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >
-- With best regards, Alexei
