I prefer the Berners-Lee line of thinking [1] - the web was always about connecting people. Wikis are one of the oldest bits of web-based technology.
-Nathan [1] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206txt.html On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Sergey Salishev < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > Besides the biz word, the philosophical concept of Web 2.0 is that content > is created or modified by user feedback. It's different from original Web > concept where content exists independent of user. So the term Web 2.0. > > By this definition the Wiki is clearly the Web 2.0 technology. And I should > note it's one of the technologies which shaped the concept. Of course the > first Wiki were developed before the term Web 2.0 was coined in. > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That's the first time I've heard of 'wiki' being 'web 2.0'. :) > > > > -Nathan > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Sergey Salishev < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I've created the > > > *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5878*< > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5878> > > > issue > > > with the WikiMark sources attached. WikiMark is the complex benchmark > > which > > > uses real life web 2.0 scenario of dynamic Wiki pages generation. It's > a > > > result of my previous year work on assessing server side scripting in > > Java > > > as part of Harmony project. This benchmark is useful for comparing the > > > performance of different JVMs. As the benchmark uses the HTTP protocol > > for > > > accessing the test subject it can be used to directly compare the > > > performance of different scripting engines such as PHP, Python, Ruby vs > > > their Java implementations (Quercus, Jython, JRuby). The benchmark uses > > > multiple threads for stressing the computer resources. In the default > > > configuration the Jetty web server with Quercus and DokuWiki PHP wiki > > > engine > > > is used. The donation also containes BTI adapter for the benchmark. All > > the > > > donated code is developed solely by me. > > > > > > Also below is a reference to my presentation on SECR 2007 on benchmark > > > results and profile analysis. > > > http://www.secr.ru/etc/1_day_11_40_-_salishev_sergei.pdf > > > > > > Speaking about performance Harmony M5 with -server shows about 80% of > > > throughput vs Sun 1.6.0_u5 x64 -server on C2Q 3.0GHz with Windows 2003 > > > Server x64. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks. > > > Sergey. > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks. > Sergey. >
