On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4 июля 2008 Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> TWIMC, >> >> Stefan Krause publishes another review on Java vs. C performance here: >> http://www.stefankrause.net/wp/?p=9#comments >> >> It seems like Harmony has "a long way to go" in performance :) >> I'm gonna look on some of these tests in near term. > > It is interesting to see that IBM is often quite close to Harmony in > performance. In fact Harmony acts quite well in its current state. I think > though that performance for Java is always a 2nd priority after stability. > Look at IBM, its Java is targeted at servers where stability is what is > important. > > Looking at the occasional test failures on the alerts mail list it seems like > stability is the number one focus for improvement and it is a by far harder > to move in that direction.
Agreed. I actually never worried much about Harmony's performance. But stability really is a touch job... > -- > Gregory > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
