Java 6 branch isn't taken into our consideration, am i right? 2008/7/29 Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> chunrong lai wrote: >> >>> Should we freeze the code base for M7, since the Jul. 28th is said to >>> be >>> the code freeze date? >>> >> >> Yes. I thought that we had a well understood procedure now that we are on >> our seventh milestone -- but I guess it is still necessary to call it out. >> >> If so, I think >>> (1) We should follow Tim's policy "no more commits please without >>> agreement from two committers on the dev list" before code unfrozen. >>> (2) We need to nominate the M7 candidate revision, do more testing, >>> analyze the critical/blocker issues and raise the issues MUST be fixed for >>> M7. >>> >> >> The code is frozen for new features or non-critical bug fixes this week. >> Nathan asked that he gets his suncompat code in there, which is fine since >> that is disabled by default anyway. > > > I checked my code in last night, so I'm good to go for testing. > > >> >> >> The focus is on stability and passing our tests. We should discuss any >> non-critical bug fixes and later this week expect to nominate a release >> candidate. >> >> (p.s. I'm disappearing on vacation for a couple of weeks after this week, >> so I'll only be around to help up to that point) >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >
-- Best Regards Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu China Software Development Lab, IBM
