I believe my web-of-trust is large enough, so I can sign a release. The other committers and PMCs should make sure to put their keys in the KEYS file in SVN and if you attend an event, try to get your key signed.
-Nathan On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sian January wrote: >> I've just concluded the vote, so let's consider the code unfrozen now. >> I do think we need Tim to sign the JARs though, so let's wait for him >> before announcing it or updating the website. > > We sign the full release artifact (.tar file) rather than individual > JARs. It would be good if three were more people who were prepared to > sign the releases. > >> Shall we come up with a list of what's new in M7 >> in the meantime? > > Yes! We have historically not been so good at promoting the > improvements ... > > Regards, > Tim > >> On 21/08/2008, chunrong lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> hi, all: >>> After the voting we agree that there are no blocked issues for M7 >>> now. Should we release M7 and unfroze the code base for Harmony development? >>> >>> My understanding is that for M7 release we will need to updated the >>> news[1] and download page[2] and place the milestone binaries [3] (the >>> Apache policy requires that released binaries must be signed and are >>> distributed via mirrors). Right? Do we need Tim's help to sign and >>> destribute them? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> ~chunrong >>> >>> [1] http://harmony.apache.org/index.html >>> [2] http://harmony.apache.org/download.cgi >>> [3] http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/milestones ( note: this is old >>> link and now doesn't exist) >>> >> >> > >
