Thanks. I see that the failures look OS dependent. For example, there seems
to be more failures in windows32 than Linux32(Fedora7).
I just reproduced the failures in windows32 and Linux32(Fedora7) with the
commit, the error messages are like
compile-tests:
[echo] Compiling CONCURRENT tests
prepare-exclude:
[concat] No existing files and no nested text, doing nothing
run-tests:
[junit] Running ExecutorsTest
[junit] Uncaught exception in pool-12-thread-1:
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:27)
[junit] at JSR166TestCase.threadAssertTrue(JSR166TestCase.java:218)
[junit] at ExecutorsTest$2.run(ExecutorsTest.java:405)
[junit] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:643)
[junit] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:668)
[junit] at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:575)
[junit] at
java.security.AccessController.doPrivilegedImpl(AccessController.java:171)
[junit] at
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:64)
[junit] at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:572)
[junit] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:670)
[junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.258 sec
[junit] Test ExecutorsTest FAILED
On 9/4/08, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> chunrong lai wrote:
> > hi, Nathan:
> > I see the commit breaks some classlib test, include
> ReentrantLockTest,
> > AbstractQueuedSynchronizerTest, ExecutorsTest and ScheduledExecutorTest,
> as
> > reported in the integrity testing. Do we need a check?
> > One can reproduce the error in the directory of working_classlib: ant
> > -Dtest.jre.home=...\drlvm\...\jdk\jre -Dtest.case=ReentrantLockTest test.
> > Thanks.
>
> In Nathan's defense, he didn't break anything but simply enabled tests
> that we should have been running. Maybe these need JIRAs and adding to
> the exclude list until somebody steps forward to address them.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
