Sean Qiu wrote: > Sounds sensible. > So could I commit it now without the test?
I would have no problem with that. Its a synchronized keyword not a load of new functionality, and if you plan to submit a scenario test then all the better. Regards, Tim > 2008/9/11 Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Sean Qiu wrote: >>> When we are trying to publish the log information by a Filehandler >>> into a same rotating set of files, >>> it will introduce multi-thread defect. >>> >>> As a result, it will throw such exception[1] while logging. >>> The root cause is that the destination file may be deleted by other >>> thread if they are not synchronized. >>> >>> I have created a jira[3] and attached a workaround for this problem. >>> >>> I am concerned that the test case of this kind will bring performance >>> issue for our unit test, >>> since it is time-consuming and uncertainty. >>> My question is do we have any testing mechanism for this situation? >> How about creating a scenario test for it in the Build/Test >> Infrastructure -- that's where we have put the other long running tests? >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> > > >
