chunrong lai wrote: > I am bothly OK with waiting results of the reliability testing or voting > with current testing status (to stick to the schedule).
Quality is more important than dates -- so I favor delaying the vote until the testing is complete and any issues addressed. Regards, Tim > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sian January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Sorry, that was an assumption on my part because it's quite late by CST. >> >> Shall we aim for Monday, or are people quite keen to stick to the schedule? >> >> >> 2008/11/7 Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Sian January wrote: >>>> Great - thanks Chunrong. In that case I think we should leave the >>>> vote until next week as there is testing still ongoing. >>> Why next week? Will it really take that long for the testing to be >>> completed Chunrong? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>>> 2008/11/7 chunrong lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> I will upload the snapshot testing result page soon. >>>>> The reliability testing has not been finished. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Sian January < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>>>>> Are there any objections to starting a vote for M8 later today? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >> number >>>>>> 741598. >>>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 >> 3AU >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >> 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >> >
