Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Tim, I see the good point in your explanation too. > > So we need to consider three options: > Option 1. Go with r711744 as M8. It is already tested, so just solidify > build. > Option 2. Fix H6013, declare r711744 + H6013 as M8, presume the > impact locality, solidify the build. > Option 3. Fix H6013, declare r711744 + H6013 as M8, re-spin the > tests, solidify the build. > > I'm voting for (3). I would be glad to be proved wrong on my concerns, > actually I would be pleased with that :) > Maybe just arrange a vote again?
Good summary -- let's hear other people's opinions. Our milestone will live for at least three months, so we do want it to be stable. Regards, Tim
